The sign should be "No Parking Here to Corner"

I agree, the sign should read "No Parking Here to Corner" placed on the same post as the SOUTHSIDE sign.

This issue has been reported to the the Traffic Systems Supervisor for him to review if addtional signage can be added to the existing poles that already have signs attached.

There doesn't seem to be a problem with attaching a sign to the post that the SOUTHSIDE sign is on. They are all over the neighborhood.

Hope you can get your sign soon!

What is the current status of this incident? Thank you.

What is the status of this issue? It appears to have remained open but I don't see any resolution. Thanks.

There has been NO resolution, the renters have been allowed to continue parking illegally. Naturally it isn't a problem since the students there and across the street are gone for the summer.

...you mean it's not a problem NOW because the students are gone for the summer. It would be so pro-active of the city to put up No Parking signs BEFORE they came back to school, wouldn't it?

It would be a GREAT time for that to happen.

Another member of this household said that would make too much sense.

Thank you for your comments and concerns. I have contacted all members of the City's Traffic Management today to ask them to look in to this issue and provide a decision and response as soon as possible on whether additional signage can be added.

The City's Traffic System Superintendent is going out this afternoon to look into this issue and provide a response and more information as soon as he returns to his office.

We haven't had a report from The City's Traffic Superintendent regarding signage for the corner at 125 Pershing Avenue. I believe we were told that he would go out last Friday and report his findings as soon as he returned to his office. Can you tell us what happened?

Below is the response from the City Traffic Engineer after talking
with our Legal department & the rest of the Traffic Management
Team:

After checking with our Legal Department and state law, it was determined that the truck in the picture is not parked illegally. State law, for example, prohibits parking within 20 feet of a cross walk, but without sidewalks and pedestrian ramps at the intersection, a cross doesn't exist. The
TMT recommended that we continue to monitor the intersection.

I find your answer to be less than satisfying. Are you saying that without a crosswalk and/or sidewalks there is no restriction on how close you can park to an intersection? I certainly hope not. I would hope that common sense would dictate that the vehicle must be far enough back that it provides for a safe entry into the intersection. The fact that there is a curve at this intersection compounds the problem. What makes it more regrettable is the problem could be solved so easily without inconveniencing anyone.

This issue has been closed.